是但劇場 (三) - 必遭天蜆
(
Daily Life : Kwokmanation)
國民,
志取,
kwokmanation,
民化島,
是但茶餐廳,
是但,
茶餐廳,
tea,
cafe,
restaurant,
whatever,
是但劇場,
dating
video is loading, please wait ...
是但劇場 (三) - 必遭天蜆
By Kwokman
Published: 30th March, 2008
B﹕ Serveur。
A﹕ Comment allez-vous, Mademoiselle? How may I be useful to you?
B﹕ 我想點個菜﹐靚仔。
A﹕ 那你走運了﹐ 我們的是但點幾樣與是但寫個菜都是家傳戶曉﹐ 燴炙人口的經典名菜。
B﹕ 我不是要是但幾樣。
A﹕ 是是但點幾樣。你想要甚麼﹐ Mademoiselle?
B﹕ 你們有沒有一時一釀豆腐﹐ 騎牛搵馬蹄露﹐ 多多億羨富貴粉腸﹐大力低B蛋散﹐ pardon me﹐ 我意思是大力低脂蛋散﹐你知啦﹐我要 keep fit 嘛。
A﹕ Sorry Mademoiselle﹐ 我們衹有才華釀青椒﹐ 做牛做馬拉糕﹐ 人人得救永生活水﹐大志高思蛋撻。或許沒甚麼適合你。
B﹕ 傻的﹐這麼大的餐廳﹐怎會沒有好食﹖ 你們有沒有死纏爛打豬腩肉, 一國兩制香蕉船﹖ 我在 London 試過﹐很可口的, 我一餐可以吃幾件一國兩制香蕉船。
A﹕ Sorry Mademoiselle﹐我們不賣這些。
B﹕ 我還以為你們是是但但﹐可以將就。
A﹕ Sorry Mademoiselle﹐ 我們的確已經很是但﹐ 但我們並不隨便﹐ 況且我們不是傻的。但我想有些菜式很適合你。你不戒意的話﹐請讓我建議是但高級雞翼。
B﹕ 好呀﹐我鍾意食雞翼。高級雞翼與低級雞翼有分別嗎﹖
A﹕ 我靜靜告訴你﹐ 高級雞翼與低級雞翼是沒有分別的﹐衹是自以為高尚的人, 都會選擇高級雞翼﹐看你的氣質談吐﹐相信也是自以為高尚的人。
B﹕ Magnifique ﹐ 我便要是但高級雞翼。還有沒有點到你氹氹轉田螺? 我在 Paris 試過﹐很可口的。
A﹕ Sorry Mademoiselle﹐我們已經不賣田螺很久﹐你喜歡蜆嗎﹖
B﹕ 好呀﹐我鍾意食蜆。是甚麼蜆﹖
A﹕ 天蜆。
B﹕ 一定很可口。是怎樣烹調的﹖
A﹕ 都是法式制作﹐Bonjour 醬汁是今早由 Paris 新鮮運到。
B﹕ 那便是 Bonjour 天蜆﹐我很鍾意食法國餐的﹐你真是 brilliant﹐我便要這個 Bonjour 天蜆。s'il vous plaît。
A﹕ 冇問題﹐這個必遭天蜆一定適合你。Bon appétit。
I must thank JGospel for letting me express my opinions uncensored and unedited even though I am not an expert in any of the topics about which I write and talk. My opinions do not represent JGospel’s view points.
Over the years I’ve seen some disturbing incidents regarding dating and courtship among Christians. It is understandable to have certain personal and subjective expectations when searching for a potential life time companion. It is easy to say that one should follow God’s will. However, I could not name anyone other than Hosea who was faithful to that claim. In reality, some people gauge on wealth when looking for a boyfriend or a girlfriend, and others appearance, charisma, wisdom, gentleness, courage, ethics, so on and so forth. I don’t believe any of these criteria should be promoted over the others with regard to dating. Many people do set such criteria and I would not say a person who is attracted to wealth is any better or worse than someone who is attracted to charisma or ethics.
These criteria are very personal. Who could judge others when their standards differ? Yet different vines yield different grapes. Each person can make her or his own choices and will face the consequences thereof. Samson was attracted to a young Philistine woman. He made his choice and paid with his dignity, freedom and life. After being tricked into marrying Leah, Jacob married Leah’s sister Rachel. Naturally, fighting among the sisters and their children went on to haunt Jacob for the rest of his life. Oh no, I don’t mean that God would like us to have such attitudes at all. For one thing, God obviously would not be pleased with Jacob’s decision to marry Rachel after marrying Leah (Leviticus 18:18). Nonetheless, out of my own wickedness and weakness, not only do I abstain from expressing my opinion toward others’ preference, I also urge them to be honest about their desire and narrow their target to what they really want.
It is unfortunate that some people don’t abide by their criteria and just pick on random suitors, out of convenience, for whatever needs they happen to come across or whatever satisfaction they want to attain. Furthermore, I am at quite a loss about how some people keep a score board for their pursuers. Like the free Thanksgiving turkeys at supermarkets, some people think that their pursuers must do enough chores and earn enough points to deserve them. I might not be an expert but shouldn’t love between lovers be mutual? I thought if you loved someone, you would give beyond reasons. If two people are really in love, wouldn’t both become pursuers of each other? Until then, I’m afraid you haven’t quite found what you really want.